However, there is good reason to believe that Matthew and Luke are in fact tracing entirely different genealogies. Jesus was born of a virgin. There are 14 generations from Abraham to David. difference between Matthew and Luke Contradictions Genealogy The Genealogy of Jesus. Matthew tells the story of the wise men. Correspondingly, Luke's gospel focuses on Mary's role in Jesus' birth, while Matthew's emphasizes Joseph's. Before examining resolutions, there are a few more subtle differences that can impact the end conclusion. How many years was it from Adam to Jesus? 1:17), with a total of 41 names. In the desert, John came to know God better than people, and when God fully owned his heart and allegiance, John was ready. However, the two lists contain noteworthy differences. Some argue that either Matthew or Luke got it wrong. They created or borrowed a genealogy in order to provide Jesus with a legitimate ancestry. Or they accuse later Christians for artificially creating a genealogy to provide Jesus with a Davidic lineage after the fact. 6. The two genealogies of Jesus Christ are found in Matthew 1:1-16 and Luke 3: 23-38. The gospels of Matthew and Luke both tell their narratives of Jesus's temptation in the wilderness in slightly different ways. Mark and Matthew may be similar gospels, but the differences in each are obvious. This is where we come to the differences in the genealogies of Matthew and Luke. Matthew and Luke give Joseph’s genealogy but in different ways. September 21, 2016. After reading Eusebius’ explanation, I began thinking why Joseph’s lineage was important at all in the first place. Luke tells the story of the shepherds. For example, Matthew reads ‘Joram fathered Uzziah’, which skips three generations according to 2 Chronicles 21:4 – 26:33. On the other hand, Matthew organizes his stories more or less into categories: teachings, parables, miracles, etc. The remaining two – Matthew and Luke – have very different accounts. Matthew. In the Gospel of Matthew, the story is told from the standpoint of a man, especially Joseph. So Matthew tells us more about what Joseph thought and did. Matthew gives Jesus' genealogy only back to Abraham, the first Jew. In Part 1 of this “Genealogy of Jesus” blog, we compared Jesus’ genealogy reported in Matthew 1: 1-16 with that reported in Luke 3: 23-38, and we noted the differences. The gospels of Matthew (Matthew 1:1-17) and Luke (Luke 3:23-38) record the genealogy of Jesus in different orders and seek to accomplish different purposes. 3:23-38) not contradict Matthew's genealogy (Ch.1:1-17), some use the logic that Joseph was Heli's son-in-law. Matthew begins with a genealogy to show Jesus' heritage and then tells of his miraculous conception and birth without any reference to a journey to Bethlehem. (Luke 2:19, 34, 35, 48, 51) In the first two chapters of his Gospel, Luke mentions Mary’s name 12 times, but Joseph’s, only 3. In Luke 3:23-38 it is shown how the genealogy of Jesus played out and how Jesus wanted to bring a relationship back to humanity that so desperately needed it. Jesus’ genealogy is given in two places in Scripture: Matthew 1 and Luke 3:23-38. But underlying their differences is essential agreement on ten most important points. It shows that Jesus was descended by blood from David. GENEALOGY OF JESUS CHRIST. The original Greek merely says Joseph was "of Heli" or Eli (verse 23). The New Testament provides two accounts of the Genealogy of Jesus, one in the Gospel of Matthew (Matthew 1:1-17) and another in the Gospel of Luke (Luke 3:23-38).Matthew starts with Abraham, while Luke begins with Adam, but that is not the only difference. His clothing (Matthew 3:4), spirit (Luke 1:17), and preparatory role (Malachi 4:5-6) are those of Elijah. However, there is good reason to believe that Matthew and Luke are in fact tracing entirely different genealogies. Critics have conflated these two accounts. Start studying Similarities and differences between Luke's and Matthew's infancy narratives. Matthew and Luke have the order of the last two temptations reversed (Matt. They cannot even agree on who the father of Joseph was. In Luke's genealogy there is only one King. He said that perhaps Matthew’s genealogy is a biological genealogy, while Luke’s genealogy is … First is the consideration of Matthew and Luke’s individual use of the Old Testament history. This has led me to ask this question:… Jesus’ family line is also listed differently in the two Gospels. Luke - Matthew-Chronicles - differences. The next obvious difference is that both genealogies trace Jesus’ lineage back to David, but through different sons. Matthew’s genealogy The book of Matthew was written specifically to Jews. Whereas Matthew uses his genealogy to begin his Infancy Narrative, Luke delays listing Jesus’ ancestors until Luke 3:23–38, placing it between Jesus’ baptism and the account of his being tempted in … Luke begins with Jesus and moves back through Abraham to Adam. In Scripture, Jesus’ genealogy is described in Matthew 1 and Luke 3:23-38. The usual practice of a Jewish genealogy is to give the name of the father, grandfather, etc., of the person in view. The genealogy in Luke 3:23-28 ascends from Joseph to Adam or rather to God; this is the first striking difference between the genealogies as presented in the First and Third Gospel. STUDY. But this does not explain why the genealogies are different after King David. 3:23-38). Matthew begins with Abraham and moves down to Jesus. There are 21 generations from Adam to Abraham. 1:1-17, throughout the genealogy. 79 The Christmas Story Trivia Questions & Answers : Gospel Mixture This category is for questions and answers related to The Christmas Story, as asked by users of FunTrivia.com. 20:5–15; 21:1–18; 27:1–28:16). Joseph, then, is his son-in-law. 1:1-17) and Luke’s. The Gospels give two completely different genealogies for Jesus. To them, Jesus' claim to be the Messiah would need to be supported by the correct pedigree (sort of like the Daughters of the American Revolution today). December 17, 2012. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. He wrote about Jesus’s basic human needs, such as … But perhaps the most interesting difference between Matthew and Luke is that Matthew includes five women in his list. Matthew begins with “The Genealogy of Jesus”. The actual date of Jesus' birth is not known, but it appears that Jesus was born sometime between 7 and 5 B.C in Bethlehem. Both Matthew and Luke refer to and take a large part of their information from the Old Testament writings. MATTHEW portrays Him as the KING of kings. Matthew recorded this for legal purposes, to show the Jews that Christ was the Messiah. But how can this be? Matthew 5:20.. Matthew starts from Abraham, Luke starts from Adam and God. Luke, on the other hand, gives the ancestry of Jesus through Mary from whom Jesus was descended physically as to his humanity. Genealogy of Jesus Christ: Matthew vs Luke. Matthew. The tone, tenor and plot of Luke’s account of the Jesus birth narrative is very different from that in Matthew’s gospel.It is set on grander scale, Mary is more prominent, and Joseph recedes into the background. The information in this section originally appeared in an article by the professor (R.P. At a glance, these two chapters appear to contradict each other. The assumption is that these are meant to be the same genealogy is false. Date Dating Luke is largely dependent on the relationship of the Gospel of Luke to Acts, the relation (Luke 3:31; Matt. Matthew’s genealogy traces the descent of Jesus to David and Abraham while Luke’s genealogy traces his descent back to God through Adam. This view is known as the two-source hypothesis. Church historian Eusebius offered another possibility for the difference between Matthew 1 and Luke 3. Jesus is no exception to this, as his genealogy is given twice in the New Testament, one in Matthew and the other in Luke. Again, from David through Jesus, the genealogies are completely different. 862 Words4 Pages. Differences of Matthew and Luke. Of the 20 miracles recorded in Luke, only 5 appear in 9:51-- 19:27. It is believed that Matthew and Luke borrowed passages from Mark's gospel and one other source lost to history. Throughout the Bible there have been numerous genealogies about some of the more important people. Keeping this in view, where is the genealogy of Jesus found? Luke begins with Jesus and moves back through Abraham to Adam. LUKE portrays Him as the SON OF MAN and JOHN portrays Him as the SON OF GOD. Some point to these differences as evidence of errors in the Bible. 1:1-17) and Luke’s. This material is predominantly made up of accounts of Jesus' discourses. They were both of the Davidic line born in Jerusalem. That Mary was also of the house of David, as a comparison with Luke 1:69 shows, Luke would fully prove by the genealogy which he introduced a little later (Luke 3:23 f). Matthew. However, the SAME Greek word is used throughout Luke's genealogy (as seen below), so one could even say that Nathan was David's son-in-law or Adam is God's son-in-law. Related quizzes can be found here: The Christmas Story … How does this help us … The Genealogy of Jesus Christ Genealogies were very important to 1st century leaders. The reason is that Luke tends to write in “consecutive order,” (Luke 1:1-4) as one might in a letter to someone. Luke has more ancestors than Mt. 1:17), with a total of 41 names. Seemingly, Matthew traces Jesus’ genealogy from Abraham to Jesus through Joseph’s lineage, establishing his legal claim to the Davi i. How does this help us to become better disciples of Christ? God is perfect ---> you be perfect. Matthew traces Joseph's ancestry through King Solomon and lists Joseph's father as Jacob, while Luke gives a line through Nathan and says Joseph is the son of Heli. Five matriarchs: Ruth, Bathsheba, Rahab, Tamar, and Marry are included in Matthew, but not in Luke. How is Matthew different from Mark? Both authors offer a specific emphasis, and neither list is exhaustive. Matthew gives Jesus' genealogy only back to Abraham, the first Jew. Matthew traces the genealogy from Jesus to Abraham. The difference between these two genealogies is not a minor one: comparing these two genealogies, we notice that Similarly Luke’s Gospel contains Jesus’ Genealogy as well. Matthew and Luke disagree. But, unlike Matthew, Luke includes the genealogy in the third chapter of Luke’s Gospel. This is where Luke inserted the genealogy, as if to demonstrate the proclamation. By doing this Matthew emphasizes the Jewishness of Jesus. 4 women - Tamar, Rehab, Ruth, Bathsheba. Matthew’s genealogy contains significantly fewer names than Luke’s genealogy, which is more comprehensive. Each has a different perspective, approach, and audience. Jesus, the Rejected Prophet: The Gospel According to Luke. The Gospel of Luke provides a genealogy for Jesus that is substantially different from that which Matthew records. If correct this would likely make Luke the only Gentile author in the New Testament.5 Third, Luke was a physician (Col 4:14). In Matthew 1:1-16, the list begins with Abraham, goes down to David in verse 6, then Solomon, Rehoboam, and on through the kings of … And one side-by-side comparison reveals that the genealogies are radically different. The genealogy of Jesus in Matthew and Luke are very different which can be confusing to many people because at first glance, it does not look like any of the names are the same. Different names. One theory for reconciling the two genealogies, first proposed in the late fifteenth century, says that the genealogy in Luke 3 is actually that of Mary rather than Joseph. Matthew’s gospel was written for the convincing of the Jewish people that Jesus was the prophesied Messianic king of the Jews. Another possible explanation for the two different genealogies is that Matthew presents a royal or legal genealogy, while Luke gives a physical, or actual, genealogy. Since Matthew and Luke are interpreting history for a specific audience, this would explain why Matthew and Luke contains differing details. Luke gives us Mary’s genealogy, while Matthew gives us Joseph’s genealogy. Matthew 1 is the genealogy from Joseph. THE GENEALOGIES IN MATTHEW AND LUKE (Matthew 1:1-17; Luke 3:23b-38) From THE NIV HARMONY OF THE GOSPELS By Robert L. Thomas and Stanley N. Gundry ESSAY 9 Both Matthew and Luke give a genealogical list for the descent of Jesus. The genealogies of Jesus may seem uninteresting (and perhaps even contradictory) at a glance, but they serve an important role in establishing His claim as the promised Messiah ().When considered together, the two genealogies (Matthew 1:1-17; Luke 3:23-28) reveal both His legal and physical descent according to the three Old Testament promises:The Messiah must be … Matthew traces the genealogy from Jesus to Abraham. Luke’s genealogy goes from Jesus all the way back up to Adam, and indeed God before him. Unlike some of the other Gospels such as Matthew, Luke traces Jesus’ genealogy back to Adam, father of all mankind instead of Abraham, father of the Jews. A census requires Joseph and Mary to go from their home in Nazareth to Bethlehem. He began at Abraham and followed the line down to Jesus, through Joseph. Luke has 14 names from Abraham to David, 21 from David to the exile, and 21 from the exile The Matthew’s genealogy runs from Abraham down to Jesus in three groups of 14 generations. Throughout the Bible there have been numerous genealogies about some of the more important people. He traces Jesus' ancestry back to Adam, the first man God created. Commentators have sometimes troubled themselves over the applications of these words, whether to Joseph or to Mary; but they surely apply to both. Are these two passages hopelessly irreconcilable? Matthew tells the story of the wise men. Jesus is more frail. Dr. Luke’s genealogy (see Luke 3:23-38) differs from Matthew’s because it emphasizes the Lord’s biological descent from David—and from Adam, the first man. The most obvious difference between the two genealogies is that Matthew’s begins with Abraham and moves forward to Christ, while Luke’s begins with Christ and traces the line backward to Adam. A much broader issue appears once we compare the Matthean genealogy to its Lukan counterpart as expounded within Luke 3:23-38. 3. Accuracy: A team of editors takes feedback from our visitors to keep trivia as up to date and as accurate as possible. Jesus’ genealogy is given in two places in Scripture: Matthew 1 and Luke 3:23-38. John has Jesus teaching for three years; Mark, Matthew and Luke present a one year ministry. MARK portrays Him as the SERVANT. Nettelhorst) published in the June 1988 issue of the Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society.. An old problem for expositors has been the contradictory genealogies of Christ given in Matthew and Luke. His cousin Jesus placed him among the greatest men in all history (Luke 7:28). Matthew clearly indicates in his gospel that that arrangement was intentional (Matthew 1:17). Mary descended from David's son Nathan and Joseph descended from David 's son Solomon. The New Testament provides two accounts of the genealogy of Jesus, one in the Gospel of Matthew and another in the Gospel of Luke. Chapter Summary. Behind these differences lies a powerful picture of the life and death of Jesus and what he came to achieve. The genealogies appear to be quite different, especially as each author traces the lineage from King David down to Jesus. For more information specifically on Matthew's creative counting, see my previous blog post. The genealogical lists by Matthew and Luke clearly establish that Jesus was the foretold Messiah. They tell us different things. The genealogy of Jesus given to us by Matthew is much different that the genealogy given by Luke. Only Matthew focuses upon the Joseph tradition for a theological reason: the Son of God still needed a human father because he was also truly human, exposed to threats which demanded parental care. The genealogy in Matthew contains 42 generations, grouped in 3 periods: 14 from Abraham to David, 14 from David to the exile, 14 from the exile to Jesus (Mt 1:17). Twenty-one of the 28 parables that occur in Luke are found in 10:30-- 19:27. 2. In fact, since Joseph's father is said to be Jacob in Matthew 1:16, Heli is most probably Mary's father. The main problems concern the many differences between Matthew’s genealogy (Matt. Matthew and Luke actually give two different genealogies. Matthew gives the genealogy of Jesus through Joseph, the legal, though not the physical father of Jesus. Luke, on the other hand, gives the ancestry of Jesus through Mary from whom Jesus was descended physically as to his humanity. C. The main difference between Matthew and Luke Genealogy is that Matthew genealogy goes from Jesus to Abraham while Luke genealogy goes from Jesus to Adam. Enter the genealogy in Luke 3, which is Mary's. Only Matthew and Luke contain Jesus’ genealogy. ii. Doctoral dissertations have been written on the messianic genealogies, so we make no pretense of having dealt with the subject exhaustively here. says "kingdom of heaven" Matthew. God stands apart from us in every way. At Luke chapter 3 is a genealogy back to “Adam, son of God.” Jesus’ genealogy is the only one given in the Christian Greek Scriptures. In the following table Luke 3:34-38 are ignored since it includes ancestral fathers before Abraham. The comparison table is from errancy.org. c. #3- There is a difference between Luke’s genealogy and Matthew’s genealogy. Firstly, Luke’s, is an ascending genealogy (tracing Jesus all the way back to Adam, and thence to God) and focuses on Jesus’ human ancestry in general. The Genealogy is perhaps more important to Matthew because it serves as evidence of who Jesus is and why he would be significant. Luke traces the genealogy from Jesus to Adam. Matthew 1 clearly explains that Joseph is Mary’s husband. Matthew starts with Abraham, while Luke begins with Adam.The lists are identical between Abraham and David, but differ radically from that point.Matthew has twenty-seven generations from David to Joseph, whereas Luke has forty … That's why Ps 87 says "this one and that one were born in her." 7. Both Matthew 1 and Luke 3 contain genealogies of Jesus.But there is one problem – they are different. Christ as Son of Man - Luke’s genealogy has a different concern than that of Matthew. Thus, Jacob is Joseph’s father (in Matthew 1:16), while Heli is Mary’s (in Luke 3:23). Jesus is no exception to this, as his genealogy is given twice in the New Testament, one in Matthew and the other in Luke. Luke’s genealogy goes all the way back to Adam, focusing on the universality of the gospel message — a message for Jews and gentiles alike everywhere. Verse Matthew 6:33. Before Luke mentions Jesus’s years of ministry, he records His genealogy through His mother Mary back to Adam, giving evidence of Jesus as a member of mankind (Lk. Constable - The differences with Jesus’ genealogy in Luke 3:23–38 are a problem that no one has been able to solve adequately. Matthew deliberately arranges his genealogy into three groups of 14 generations each (Matt. There are at least two possible explanations. Matthew on the other hand traces the genealogy from David, to Solomon, and down through a series of other Jewish kings. In trying to make Luke's genealogy (Ch. Matthew. Eusebius: Matthew’s Genealogy is Biological, While Luke’s Genealogy is Legal. The falsified genealogy that opens the book of Matthew is an interesting enigma. Matthew 1:16 says that Joseph’s father was Jacob; Luke 3:23 says that Joseph’s father was Heli. Matthew groups his information in 3 sets of 14, skipping paternal fathers at times. I’d hate to disappoint Mr. Seidensticker by making the common rebuttal, but I think it’s the right answer. Here are the differences between Luke’s and Matthew’s narrative birth stories. His genealogy is given in reverse order and reaches all the way back to the creation of the first man, Adam, another “son of God.”. One of the differences between the stories of Matthew and Luke in their infancy narratives is in their genealogies of Jesus (which for Luke, oddly enough, does not actually occur in his infancy narrative!). The genealogy in Luke 3:23-28 ascends from Joseph to Adam or rather to God; this is the first striking difference between the genealogies as presented in the First and Third Gospel. In other words, Matthew lists the official line of Davidic kings, not Jesus’ actual ancestors. For example, Matthew reads ‘Joram fathered Uzziah’, which skips three generations according to 2 Chronicles 21:4 – 26:33. 25 December was fixed as his birth date more than 500 years after the event on purely hypothetical data. There are 21 names from the exile to Joseph. One genealogy is a royal or legal genealogy, and the other is a physical genealogy. The prophecies came to pass as recorded in the New Testament, and the genealogy of Jesus can be found in Matthew 1:2-16 and Luke 3:23-38. Matthew’s Genealogy on page 16.) 4. Several explanations have been put forth: 1. Matthew, Mark and Luke give accounts of some of the same events so they are referred to as the "Synoptic Gospels". When these are compared, differences and difficulties appear immediately. Luke gives the genealogy as far back as he could. It also ignores the fact that Luke carefully avoided using the word “begat,” which occurs in Matt. There are differences of opinion with … Luke gives the genealogy as far back as he could. God promised Adam that the savior would be his descendant and Luke proves that the savior is the descendant of Adam. Luke. • First, it is likely that the manger area where Jesus was born (Luke 2:7) was part of a house, and the Magi may have come to … The main difference between Matthew and Luke Genealogy is that Matthew genealogy goes from Jesus to Abraham while Luke genealogy goes from Jesus to Adam.. On the other is a series of fifteen Jewish kings in different ways //www.theology.edu/ap10.htm >! Better disciples of Christ < /a > ii it is believed that Matthew and Luke are basically the genealogy... Explain why the genealogies are completely different genealogies for Joseph ( Matthew 41. Are completely different genealogies for Joseph ( Matthew 1:17 ), with a total of 41 names among the men... Their genealogies that have given critics endless problems so, that skeptics believe they ’ re.., the first century and this traditional genealogy is a relative to all people just. An entirely different line leading to Jesus please share it via social media!... Just the Jews want to highlight a few of the same events so they are referred to as the Synoptic! From the standpoint of a man, especially in regard to genealogies savior. David to Jesus, through Joseph has no involvement in Matthew 1 and refer. Differences of Matthew and Luke are in fact, since Joseph 's and therefore the Romans Adam Solomon... The right answer a flesh and blood descendant of King David through Jesus, the son Adam! December was fixed as his birth date more than 500 years after the event on purely data... Different ways so much so, that skeptics believe they ’ re irreconcilable teachings, parables, miracles etc! Other study tools the Romans: teachings, parables, miracles, etc of having dealt with the subject here! Listed differently in the following table Luke 3:34-38 are ignored since it includes ancestral fathers before Abraham death of Christ. //Wol.Jw.Org/En/Wol/D/R1/Lp-E/1200001647 '' > genealogy of Jesus of Nazareth, one in Matthew, Luke starts from Abraham forward Jesus. Event on purely hypothetical data genealogies from Matthew 1:1-18 and Luke include genealogies in their records make pretense... Explains that Joseph is Mary ’ s genealogy the book of Matthew we find the genealogy Joseph! Could not deny it disciples of Christ having dealt with the subject here! Fact, since Joseph 's Matthew records his information in this brief post I want to highlight few... Https: //isjesusalive.com/why-do-matthew-and-luke-give-us-two-different-genealogies-for-jesus/ '' > a hopeless Bible contradiction are basically the same events so they are referred as... Good reason to believe that Matthew and Luke present several important differences in the following table Luke 3:34-38 are since. Chronicles chapters 1 to 3, running from Abraham down to Jesus this is where we come to differences!: //isjesusalive.com/why-do-matthew-and-luke-give-us-two-different-genealogies-for-jesus/ '' > Luke Commentary < /a > by doing that is! Interesting enigma to Abraham, but the name Jesus ( Matt making the common rebuttal, but through sons! Just the Jews were meticulous record keepers, especially in regard to genealogies New Testament two. Two entirely contradictory genealogies for Jesus that is substantially different from that which Matthew records Luke emphasized as. Luke... < matthew and luke genealogy differences > 1, and does not mention the name of,. And difficulties appear immediately perspective, approach, and more with flashcards, games and. Genealogies for Joseph ( Matthew - 41, Luke was probably a Gentile ( Col 4:10–14 ) mentioned. Editors takes feedback from our visitors to keep trivia as up to date and as accurate as possible is. Interesting enigma and does not explain why the genealogies are completely different Ps 87 ``. Are radically different the assumption is that these are meant to be in... Different line leading to Jesus find the genealogy of Jesus //www.youtube.com/watch? v=Fq_9fYXzHyw '' >.. Challenge to Herod and therefore the Romans this traditional genealogy is a relative to all people not just Jews... For studying the Gospels, but Luke genealogy begins with Jesus and what he came achieve. From Matthew 1:1-18 and Luke are basically the same from Abraham to Adam ten most points... Are meant to be Jacob in Matthew 1:16, Heli is most probably Mary 's father said. Adam through Solomon and Zerubbabel descended by blood from David through Jesus, the first century and traditional... Of these women as significant mothers in Jesus ' genealogy only back to Abraham, was... Re irreconcilable and did explanation, I began thinking why Joseph ’ s genealogy, other! Avoided using the word “ begat, ” which occurs in Matt by. Beloved son, '' or Christ 's life in public contains Jesus ’ genealogy –... A one year ministry compared, differences and difficulties appear immediately but in different ways correspondingly Luke! Do both Matthew and Luke present a one year ministry the wise men Mary emphasis physical! Have the group divide into small groups one King lineage after the fact, these chapters! Matthew and Luke are in fact tracing entirely different genealogies... genealogy one. Husband 's name //bible.org/seriespage/lesson-1-genealogy-promised-king-matthew-11-17 '' > genealogy of Jesus Christ gives the genealogy of '! These birth narratives significantly fewer names than Luke ’ s genealogy moves backwards past matthew and luke genealogy differences... Demonstrate the proclamation he could most probably Mary 's father, women were not included in the genealogies are after! Information specifically on Matthew 's genealogy represents a much stronger challenge to Herod and therefore the Romans lineage important! More about what Joseph thought and did, unlike Matthew, Mark and Matthew be. Want to highlight a few of the first century and this traditional genealogy is reason... Source lost to history Abraham forward > the genealogies are different after David! His humanity Luke, on the mount... genealogy is false genealogy starts with Abraham moves. Matthew, the son of God. the subject exhaustively here make no of... Began thinking why Joseph ’ s account they can not even agree on who father! Follows this pattern, and other study tools of 41 names //infidels.org/library/modern/paul-carlson-nt-contradictions/ '' > Luke < /a > chapter.! 4:10–14 ) from their home in Nazareth to Bethlehem man, especially.... The right answer creative counting, see my previous blog post but I think it s! Accuse later Christians for artificially creating a genealogy for Jesus that is substantially different from that which records! 7:28 ) not even agree on who the father of Jesus and moves back through Abraham Adam! A comparison of Matthew was written for the convincing of the Jews that Christ was the.... A relative matthew and luke genealogy differences all people not just the Jews evidence of who Jesus is a physical genealogy this Matthew the. ( Matthew 1:17 ) that God is perfect -- - > you perfect..., from David through Jesus, the first Jew Mary 's father or less into categories teachings! Mary descended from David 's son Solomon much so, that skeptics they... And why he would be significant three generations according to Luke ancestry back to Abraham, the Jew. Logic that Joseph was `` of Heli '' or Eli ( verse 23 ) take a part! And indeed God before him David Luke has an entirely different genealogies Joseph.: //www.theology.edu/ap10.htm '' > Contradictions < /a > ii disappoint Mr. Seidensticker by the... Come to the differences in each are obvious legal genealogy, and so he marries Mary focuses... Gospel contains Jesus ’ genealogy is described in Matthew 's genealogy there is good reason to believe that and... About Jesus ’ actual ancestors < /a > the genealogy in order to provide Jesus with Davidic... The comparative method for studying the Gospels give two contradictory genealogies for Jesus that is substantially different from that Matthew! 3:34-38 are ignored since it includes ancestral fathers before Abraham, terms, and Bathsheba are mentioned the that... The lineage from King David and difficulties appear immediately give two contradictory genealogies Joseph... As evidence of who Jesus is a physical genealogy his birth date than... Follows this pattern, and other study tools the greatest men in all history ( Luke 7:28.! Genealogy goes from Jesus all the way back up to Adam //isjesusalive.com/why-do-matthew-and-luke-give-us-two-different-genealogies-for-jesus/ >... How are the two Gospels reassure him, and so he marries Mary differences and difficulties appear immediately merely! The prophesied Messianic King of the wise men neither list is exhaustive, Luke starts from Abraham forward Matthew. 'S genealogy there is only one King fewer names than Luke ’ s.! These birth narratives more than 500 years after the event on purely data... Placed him among the greatest men in all history ( Luke 7:28 )? v=Fq_9fYXzHyw '' > <. Birth narratives Luke and ignores Matthew. is broken into sections, Luke - 76 5! Well-Known that even the Pharisees and Sadducees could not deny it made up of of... Teachings, parables, miracles, etc 's role in Jesus ' genealogy only to... A powerful picture of the same genealogy is false Matthew 1:1-18 and matthew and luke genealogy differences. Luke... < /a > Matthew and the other hand, Matthew organizes his stories more less! Why Joseph ’ s genealogy but in different ways ignored since it includes ancestral fathers before Abraham perspective,,. Created or borrowed a genealogy to provide Jesus with a legitimate ancestry genealogy contains significantly fewer names Luke. Of 41 names if you enjoyed it and think other will, share! He came to achieve ( Matthew 1:17 ), with a total of 41.. 1:16, Heli is most probably Mary 's ancestry is given as a single list the truth Jesus... Manger, shepherds or donkeys opens the book of Matthew and Luke 's Gospel and one side-by-side comparison reveals the! Jewishness of Jesus through Mary from whom Jesus was descended physically as to his.. Said, `` this one and that one were born in Jerusalem women were not included the... Be his descendant and Luke include genealogies in their records Matthew because it serves as evidence of Jesus!